Absurdities of the Bible

by Clarence Darrow

Little Blue Book No. 1637

Edited by E. Haldeman-Julius

HALDEMAN-JULIUS PUBLICATIONS

GIRARD, KANSAS




Why am I an agnostic? Because I don't believe some of the
things that other people say they believe. Where do you get your
religion, anyway? I won't bother to discuss just what religion is,
but I think a fair definition of religion could take account of two
things, at least, immortality and God, and that both of them are
based on some book, so practically all of it is a book.

As I have neither the time nor the learning to discuss every
religious book on earth, and as I live in Chicago, I am interested
in the Christian religion. So I will discuss the book that deals
with the Christian religion. Is the Bible the work of anything but
man? Of course, there is no such book as the Bible. The Bible to
made up of 66 books, some of them written by various authors at
various times, covering a period of about 1,000 years -- all the
literature that they could find over a period longer than the time
that has elapsed since the discovery of America down to the present
time.

Is the Bible anything but a human book? Of course those who
are believers take both sides of it. If there is anything that
troubles them, "We don't believe this." Anything that doesn't
trouble them they do believe.

What about its accounts of the origin of the world? What about
its account of the first man and the first woman? Adam was the
first, made about less than 6,000 years ago. Well, of course, every
scientist knows that human beings have been on the earth at least
a half-million years, probably more. Adam got lonesome and they
made a companion for him. That was a good day's work -- or a day's
work, anyhow.

From Rib to Woman

They took a simple way to take one of Adam's ribs and cut it
out and make it into a woman, Now, is that story a fact or a myth?
How many preachers would say it was a myth? None! There are some
people who still occupy Christian pulpits who say it is, but they
used to send them to the stake for that.

If it isn't true then, what is? How much did they know about
science in those days, how much did they know about the heavens and
the earth? The earth was flat, or did God write that down, or did
the old Hebrew write it down because he didn't know any better and
nobody else then knew any better?

What was the heavens? The sun was made to light the day and
the moon to light the night. The sun was pulled out in the day time
and taken in at night and the moon was pulled across after the sun
was taken out. I don't know what they did in the dark of the moon.
They must have done something.

The stars, all there is about the stars, "the stars he made
also." They were just "also." Did the person who wrote that know
anything whatever about astronomy? Not a thing. They believed they
were just little things up in the heavens, in the firmament, just
a little way above the earth, about the size of a diamond in an
alderman's shirt stud. They always believed it until astronomers
came along and told them something different.

Adam and Eve were put in a garden where everything was lovely
and there were no weeds to hoe down. They were allowed to stay
there on one condition, and that is that they didn't eat of the
tree of knowledge. That has been the condition of the Christian
church from then until now. They haven't eaten as yet, as a rule
they do not.

They were expelled from the garden, Eve was tempted by the
snake who presumably spoke to her in Hebrew. And she fell for it
and of course Adam fell for it, and then they were driven out. How
many believe that story today?

If the Christian church doesn't believe it why doesn't it say
so? You do not find them saying that. If they do not believe it
here and there, someone says it. That is, he says it at great
danger to his immortal soul, to say nothing of his good standing in
his church.

The snake was cursed to go on his belly after that. How he
went before, the story doesn't say. And Adam was cursed to work.
That is why we have to work. That is, some of us -- not I.

And Eve and all of her daughters to the end of time were
condemned to bring forth children in pain and agony. Lovely God,
isn't it? Lovely?

Can't Believe Story

If that story was necessary to keep me out of hell and put me
in heaven -- necessary for my life -- I wouldn't believe it because
I couldn't believe it.

I do not think any God could have done it and I wouldn't
worship a God who would. It is contrary to every sense of justice
that we know anything about.

God had a great deal of trouble with the earth after he made
it. People were building a tower -- the Tower of Babylon -- so that
they could go up and peek over.

God didn't want them to do that and so confounded their
tongues. A man would call up for a pall of mortar and they would
send him up a tub of suds, or something like that. They couldn't
understand each other.

Is that true? How did they happen to right it? They found
there were various languages; and that is the origin of the
languages. Everybody knows better today.

Is that story true? Did God write it? He must have known; he
must have been all-knowing then as he is all-knowing now.

I do not need to mention them. You remember that joyride that
Balaam was taking on the ass. That was the only means of locomotion
they had besides walking. It is the only one pretty near that they
have now. Balaam wanted to get along too fast and he was beating
the ass and the ass turned around and asked him what he was doing
it for. In Hebrew, of course. It must have been in Hebrew for
Balaam was a Jew.

And Joshua Said to the Sun, "Stand Still."

Is that true or is it a story?

And Joshua; you remember about Joshua.

He was a great general. Very righteous and he was killing a
lot of people and he hadn't quite finished the job and so he turned
to the mountain top and said to the sun, "Stand still till I finish
this job," and it stood still.

Is that one of the true ones or one of the foolish ones?

There are several things that that does. It shows how little
they knew about the earth and day and night. Of course, they
thought that if the sun stood still it wouldn't be pulled along any
further and the night wouldn't come on. We know that if it had
stood still from that day to this it wouldn't have affected the day
or night; that is affected by the revolution of the earth on its
axis.

Is it true? Am I wicked because I know it cannot possibly be
true? Have you got to get rid of all your knowledge and all your
common sense to save your soul?

Wait until I am a little older; maybe I can then. But my
friend says that he doesn't believe those stories. They are
figurative.

Are they figurative? Then what about the New Testament? Why
does he believe these stories?

Here was a child born of a virgin. What evidence is there?

'Twas the Fashion

What evidence? Do you suppose you could get any positive
evidence that would make anyone believe that story today or
anybody, no matter who it was?

Child, born of a virgin! There were at least four miraculous
births recorded in the Testament. There was Sarah's child, there
was Samson, there was John the Baptist, and there was Jesus.
Miraculous births were rather a fashionable thing in those days,
especially in Rome, where most of the theology was laid out.

Caesar had a miraculous birth, Cicero, Alexander from
Macedonia -- nobody was in style or great unless he had a
miraculous birth. It was a land of miracles.

What evidence is there of it? How much evidence would it
require for intelligent people to believe such a story? It wouldn't
be possible to bring evidence anywhere in this civilized land
today, right under your own noses. Nobody would believe it anyway,
and yet some people say that you must believe that without a
scintilla of evidence of any sort.

Jesus had brothers and sisters older than Himself. His
genealogy by Matthew is traced to his father, Joseph, in the first
chapter of Matthew. Read that. What did he do?

Well, now, probably some of his teachings were good. We have
heard about the Sermon on the Mount. There isn't a single word
contained in the Sermon on the Mount that isn't contained in what
is called the Sacred Book of the Jews, long before He lived -- not
one single thing.

Jesus was an excellent student of Jewish theology, as anybody
can tell by reading the Gospels; every bit of it was taken from
their books of authority, and He simply said what He had heard of
for years and years.

But let's look at some things charged to Him. He walked on the
water. Now how does that sound? Do you suppose Jesus walked on the
water? Joe Smith tried it when he established the Mormon religion.
What evidence have you of that?

He found some of His disciples fishing and they hadn't gotten
a bite all day. Jesus said, "Cast your nets down there," and they
drew them in full of fish. The East Indians couldn't do better than
that. What evidence is there of it?

He was at a performance where there were 5,000 people and they
were out of food, and He asked them how much they had; five loaves
and three fishes, or three fishes and five loaves, or something
like that, and He made the five loaves and three fishes feed all
the multitude and they picked up I don't know how many barrels
afterward. Think of that.

How does that commend itself to intelligent people, coming
from a land of myth and fable as all Asia was, a land of myth and
fable and ignorance in the main, and before anybody knew anything
about science? And yet that must be believed -- and is -- to save
us from our sins.

What are these sins? What has the human race done that was so
bad, except to eat of the tree of knowledge? Does anybody need to
save man from his sins in a miraculous way? It is an absurd piece
of theology which they themselves say that you must accept on faith
because your reason won't lead you to it. You can't do it that way.

We Must Develop Reason

I know the weakness of human reason, other people's reason. I
know the weakness of it, but it is all we have, and the only safety
of man is to cultivate it and extend his knowledge so that he will
be sure to understand life and as many of the mysteries of the
universe as he can possibly solve.

Jesus practiced medicine without medicine. Now think of this
one. He was traveling along the road and somebody came and told Him
there was a sick man in the house and he wanted Him to cure him.
How did He do it? Well, there were a lot of hogs out in the front
yard and He drove the devils out of a man and cured him, but He
drove them into the hogs and they jumped into the sea. Is that a
myth or is it true?

If that is true, if you have got to believe that story in
order to have your soul saved, you are bound to get rid of your
intelligence to save the soul that perhaps doesn't exist at all.
You can't believe a thing just because you want to believe it and
you can't believe it on very poor evidence, You may believe it
because your grandfather told you it was true, but you have got to
have some such details.

Did He raise a dead man to life? Why, tens of thousands of
dead men and women have been raised to life according to all the
stories and all the traditions. Was this the only case? All Europe
is filled with miracles of that sort, the Catholic church
performing miracles almost to the present time. Does anybody
believe it if they use their senses? I say, No. It is impossible to
believe it if you use your senses.

Now take the soul. People in this world instinctively like to
keep on living. They want to meet their friends again, and all of
that. They cling to life. Schopenhauer called it the will to live.
I call it the momentum of a going machine. Anything that is going
keeps on going for a certain length of time. It is all momentum.
What evidence is there that we are alive after we are dead?

But that wasn't the theory of theology. The theory of theology
-- and it is a part of a creed of practically every Christian
church today -- is that you die and go down into the earth and you
are dead, and when Gabriel comes back to blow his horn, the dust is
gathered together and, lo and behold, you appear the same old
fellow again and live here on earth!

How many believe it? And yet that is the only idea of
immortality that there is, and it is in every creed today, I
believe.

Matter Indestructible

And everything that is in the body and in the man goes into
something else, turns into the crucible of nature, goes to make
trees and grass and weeds and fruit, and is eaten by all kinds of
life, and in that way goes on and on.

Of course, in a sense, nobody dies. The matter that is in me
will exist in another form when I am dead. The force that is in me
will live in some other kind of force when I am dead. But I will be
gone.

That isn't the kind of immortality people want. They want to
know that they can recognize Mary Jane in heaven. Don't they? They
want to see their brothers and their sisters and their friends in
heaven. It isn't possible. We know where our life began; we know
where it ends.

We know where every individual life on earth began. It began
in a single cell, in the body of our mother, who had some 10,000 of
those cells. It was fertilized by a spermatozoon from the body of
our father, who had a million of them, any one of which, under
certain circumstances, would fertilize a cell.

They multiplied and divided until a child was born. And in old
age or accident or disease, they fall apart and the man is done.

Agnostic Because I Must Reason

Can you imagine an eternity with one end cut off? Something
that began but never ended? We began our immortality at a certain
time, when the cell and the spermatozoon conspired to form a human
being. We began then. If I am not the product of a spermatozoon and
a cell, and if those cells which are unfertilized produce life, and
those spermatozoa that fertilized no life were still alive, then I
must have 10,000 brothers and sisters on my mother's side and a
million on my father's. It is utterly absurd.

Now I am not a revivalist. In fact, I am not interested. I am
asked to say why I am an agnostic. I am an agnostic because I trust
my reason. It may not be the greatest that ever existed. I am
inclined to admit that it isn't. But it is the best I have. That is
a mighty sight better than some other people's at that. I am an
agnostic because no man living can form any picture of any God, and
you can't believe in an object unless you can form a picture of it.
You way believe in the force, but not in the object.

If there is any God in the universe I don't know it. Some
people say they know it instinctively. Well, the errors and foolish
things that men have known instinctively are so many we can't talk
about them.

As a rule, the less a person knows, the surer he is, and he
gets it by instinct, and it can't be disputed, for I don't know
what is going on in another man's mind. I have no such instinct.

Let me give you just one more idea of a miracle of this Jesus
story which has run down through the ages and is not at all the
sole property of the Christian.

You remember, when Jesus was born in a manger according to the
story, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem. And they
were led by a star.

Now the closest star to the earth is more than a billion miles
away. Think of the star leading three moth-eaten camels to a
manger! Can you imagine a star standing over any house?

Can you imagine a star standing over the earth even? What will
they say, if they had time? That was a miracle. It came down to the
earth.

Well, if any star came that near the earth or anywhere near
the earth, it would immediately disarrange the whole solar system.
Anybody who can believe those old myths and tables isn't governed
by reason.